<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defending a neighbor&#8217;s property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://programmedthought.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/defending-a-neighbors-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://programmedthought.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/defending-a-neighbors-property/</link>
	<description>That's what they want us to think...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:09:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Silverman</title>
		<link>http://programmedthought.wordpress.com/2008/06/30/defending-a-neighbors-property/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Silverman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://programmedthought.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I thought traditionally shooting someone in the back was a pretty good way to get arrested, because it is very difficult to claim you are in immediate physical danger, and thus it is an unjustifiable homicide.  In most cases I can think of, a human life is more valuable than anything the person is likely to be carrying.  Shoot a home invader, fine, but don&#039;t shoot someone who is retreating and not threatening to you.  It is &quot;life, liberty, and property&quot; in that order.

Last I checked Texas was part of the South, a land with a tradition on honorable duels.  I don&#039;t imagine shooting someone in the back as they run away is very honorable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought traditionally shooting someone in the back was a pretty good way to get arrested, because it is very difficult to claim you are in immediate physical danger, and thus it is an unjustifiable homicide.  In most cases I can think of, a human life is more valuable than anything the person is likely to be carrying.  Shoot a home invader, fine, but don&#8217;t shoot someone who is retreating and not threatening to you.  It is &#8220;life, liberty, and property&#8221; in that order.</p>
<p>Last I checked Texas was part of the South, a land with a tradition on honorable duels.  I don&#8217;t imagine shooting someone in the back as they run away is very honorable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
